The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments today in a case involving President Donald Trump’s executive order to end birthright citizenship. At the center of the case is the question of whether federal judges can issue nationwide orders to block policies as legal challenges move through lower courts. According to SCOTUSblog, no clear picture emerged of how the justices will resolve that dispute. The administration in March asked the court to weigh in on preliminary injunctions imposed by lower courts. A decision in the case is expected by late June or early July according to the news source.

The winners of the Seventh Annual Federal Court Civics Essay Contest were honored at a celebration this week at the Howard H. Baker Jr. U.S. Courthouse in Knoxville. The first place winner was Gabriella D’Agostino, a freshman at Chuckey Doak High School in Afton. Marteze Simpson, a junior at Knox County’s Fulton High School, won second place. Third place went to Jefferson County High School junior Alexa Longmire. Chief U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Suzanne H. Bauknight, U.S. Magistrate Judge Cynthia R. Wyrick and U.S. District Judge Katherine A. Crytzer were on hand to congratulate the students. The essay contest is sponsored by the court’s Civics and Outreach Committee and the Federal Bar Association chapters in Knoxville and Greeneville. This year’s contest asked students to consider the meaning of the term “reasonableness” as applied to the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition on unreasonable force by law enforcement. Read more from Chattanoogan.com.

This healthcare liability case comes before the court on appeal from the trial court’s granting of a Rule 12.02(6) motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The defendants asserted that the plaintiff failed to comply with Tennessee Code Annotated section 29-26-121, part of Tennessee’s Health Care Liability Act. The trial court found that the plaintiff failed to establish that unsigned medical authorizations attached to the complaint were sufficient to satisfy the mandatory requirements of section 29-26-121 and dismissed the case. The plaintiff appealed. Upon our review, we reverse the judgment of the trial court.

Janie Varnell will be Hamilton County's next attorney following a vote by the county commission, the Times Free Press reports. She will take office on July 1, replacing Rheubin Taylor who has held the role for over 30 years and is retiring. Varnell, previously a private practice attorney who has worked extensively on legal cases concerning police, has been serving as a special adviser to the county mayor and commission. County Mayor Weston Wamp last year named Varnell as his pick to succeed Taylor and attempted to have her installed early. A judge sided with Taylor saying his contract with the county protected his position until his contract expires in July.

JANE B. STRANCH, Circuit Judge. Sean Hart and Tiffany Guzman appeal the district court’s dismissal of their excessive force claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the City of Grand Rapids, Sergeant Brad Bush, and Officers Benjamin Johnson and Phillip Reinink. Hart and Guzman claim that the officers employed excessive force during a 2020 Black Lives Matter demonstration in Grand Rapids and that the City ratified this unlawful conduct. The officers moved for summary judgment based on qualified immunity, and the City moved for summary judgment based on the failure of Hart and Guzman to establish municipal liability. The district court granted the motions, dismissing the federal claims and declining to exercise jurisdiction over Hart and Guzman’s state law claims. For the reasons that follow, we AFFIRM the grant of summary judgment based on qualified immunity as to Officer Johnson and Sergeant Bush and AFFIRM the grant of summary judgment in favor of the City, but we REVERSE the grant of summary judgment based on qualified immunity as to Officer Reinink, and REMAND for further proceedings on that claim.

THAPAR, Circuit Judge. Brandi Goodwin worked as a part-time nursing assistant at a hospital. After she contracted COVID-19, she filed for short-term disability benefits. Unum Life Insurance Company, the administrator of the hospital’s employee-benefits plans, approved her claim. But the short-term disability benefits soon ran out. When it came time to decide whether Goodwin would receive long-term disability benefits, Unum denied her claim. The district court upheld Unum’s denial. Because Unum’s decision was neither procedurally nor substantively unreasonable, we affirm.

This is an action for abuse or neglect, exploitation, or theft of money or property of Christine Joy Koczwara during her life, as provided by Tennessee Code Annotated § 71- 6-120(b) of the Tennessee Adult Protection Act. The complaint seeks to recover assets as well as compensatory and punitive damages. After the defendant failed to file a timely responsive pleading to the complaint, the trial court entered a default judgment on the issue of liability. Prior to the trial on damages, the defendant moved to set aside the default judgment on the ground of excusable neglect. The claimed excuse was based on the contention that the defendant was the named executor and sole beneficiary under a purported 2020 will. The trial court rejected that argument because there was no pending will contest and the defendant had not filed a petition to admit the purported will to probate. The trial court also denied the motion to set aside upon the finding that the defendant’s failure to file a responsive pleading was willful. After a trial on damages, the court invalidated a quitclaim deed, ordered the return of personal property, and awarded $48,500 in compensatory damages and $97,000 in punitive damages against the defendant. The court also ordered the sale of the decedent’s real property. This appeal followed. We affirm in part and vacate in part.

This is an appeal from a divorce proceeding. The mother appeals, arguing, among other things, that the trial court failed to properly apply the statutory best interest factors when making its parenting plan determination. Because of the lack of findings in the final decree, we vacate and remand for further proceedings.

Former Tennessee Supreme Court Justice Roger A. Page has joined Miles Mediation & Arbitration, an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) provider, as a full-time mediator and arbitrator. Page practiced law in Tennessee and Georgia from 1984 to 1998, before being elected as circuit judge in West Tennessee. During his time on the bench, he began handling Rule 31A, Section 16 judicial settlement conferences, participating in mediations involving medical malpractice, personal injury, construction, wrongful death and real estate disputes. He continued to handle judicial settlement conferences until he joined the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals in 2011. He joined the Tennessee Supreme Court in 2016 and served until last year. Page can be reached at 731-426-0861 and rpage@milesadr.com.

A Washington, D.C., based federal judge has temporarily blocked the Department of Justice (DOJ) from canceling $3.2 million in grants to the American Bar Association (ABA), Reuters reports. The grants have been used to train lawyers to represent victims of domestic and sexual violence since 1995 according to the group. In the opinion, Judge Christopher Cooper said, "The First Amendment injury is concrete and ongoing. The ABA regularly engages in protected expressive activity, and DOJ’s termination of its grants directly punishes that activity." The ABA sued the DOJ in April, claiming the agency illegally terminated the grants in retaliation for the association’s public criticism of the Trump administration.