JULIA SMITH GIBBONS, Circuit Judge. Defendant Omar Wala pled guilty to conspiracy and substantive counterfeiting after manufacturing and selling 16.1 million counterfeit alprazolam pills on the dark web over a five-year period. On appeal, Wala challenges the district court’s methodology for calculating loss and its application of that methodology under § 2B1.1 of the Sentencing Guidelines. Wala also challenges the district court’s imposition of two sentencing enhancements because it found his offense involved (1) 10 or more victims or mass-marketing and (2) the conscious or reckless risk of death or serious bodily injury. We affirm the district court’s sentence.

The defendant, Nolan T. Williams, pled guilty to rape. After a sentencing hearing, the trial court ordered the defendant to serve an eight-year sentence in confinement with the Tennessee Department of Correction. On appeal, the defendant contends the trial court erred in sentencing him to confinement. Following review, we dismiss the appeal as untimely.

In 2023, the Defendant, Teresa Shinpaugh, pleaded guilty to one count of criminally negligent homicide and one count of aggravated neglect of an elderly or vulnerable adult, in exchange for the dismissal of the remaining counts of her indictment and pursuant to the agreement that the trial court would determine the length and manner of service of her sentence. After a hearing, the trial court sentenced the Defendant to concurrent sentences of two and eight years with one year to serve in confinement and the remainder to be served on probation. On appeal, the Defendant asserts that the trial court erred when it sentenced her to one year of confinement. After a review of the record and applicable law, we affirm the trial court’s judgments.

A Hardeman County jury convicted the defendant, Randy Jackson, of indecent exposure in a penal institution, for which he received six years in confinement at 60%. On appeal, the defendant contends the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support his conviction. After reviewing the record and considering the applicable law, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The petitioner, Carlos Gonzalez, appeals the denial of his post-conviction petition, arguing the post-conviction court erred in finding he received the effective assistance of counsel. After our review of the record, briefs, and applicable law, we affirm the denial of the petition.

In the spring of 2023, The Metro Nashville Police Department (“Metro”) received several public records requests seeking information about a school shooting that occurred in a Nashville private school on March 27, 2023. Metro denied all such requests. The various requestors filed petitions for access to the records in the Davidson County courts, which were eventually consolidated into one action. The private school at which the shooting occurred, its affiliated church, and parents of surviving children intervened in the action as parties. These intervening parties advocated that the school shooter’s personal writings and other creative works, which Metro collected in the course of its investigation, should remain confidential. The trial court ultimately denied all petitions for access to Metro’s file for numerous reasons. The requestors appeal to this Court. Following our review, we affirm in part and reverse in part. We affirm the trial court’s finding that the intervening parents have standing to raise arguments under the United States Copyright Act. We also affirm the trial court’s finding that neither Article I, section 35 of the Tennessee Constitution, nor Tennessee Code Annotated section 40-38-102, bar disclosure of any public records in this case. On all other issues, we reverse the trial court. The case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

The trial court terminated a mother’s parental rights to her two minor children after finding clear and convincing evidence that the conditions that led to the children’s removal persist, that the mother failed to manifest an ability to assume custody of the children, and that termination of the mother’s parental rights was in the best interests of the children. The mother appeals. Upon diligent review of the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment of the trial court.

On Jan. 30, the Tennessee Supreme Court suspended Shelby County lawyer Sheila L. Robinson-Beasley from the practice of law for six years, with five years to be served on active suspension and the remainder on probation. The court conditioned probation on Robinson-Beasley employing a practice monitor for one year, attending the Board of Professional Responsibility’s ethics workshop, and complying with all terms of the suspension, CLE requirements and fees and court costs owed. The court found that Robinson-Beasley did not follow proper protocol in the execution and use of a durable power of attorney and limited power of attorney prepared on behalf of an ill family member. In addition, following the death of that individual, she converted assets belonging to the estate and made false representations about the powers of attorney to those involved in the sale of the deceased’s residence and at the deceased’s bank. Her conduct was determined to violate Tennessee Rules of Professional Conduct 1.1, 1.3, 1.15, 4.1 and 8.4.

The Tennessee Supreme Court permanently disbarred Sumner County lawyer Jocelyn Doria Mims on Jan. 30. The court took the action after determining that Mims’s felony convictions for tampering with evidence, making a false report and intentionally failing to report child sexual abuse constituted serious criminal conduct that was prejudicial to the administration of justice and reflected adversely on her honesty, trustworthiness and fitness as a lawyer. Her actions were determined to violate Tennessee Rules of Professional Conduct 1.2(d), 1.6(c), 3.3(h), 3.4(a)-(b), 4.1(a) and 8.4(a), (b), (c) and (d).

U.S. District Judge Aleta A. Trauger earlier this week denied a bid to file an amicus brief from the Indian Gaming Association, the National Congress of American Indians, gaming associations from four states and 21 federally recognized tribes. The Nashville Post reports that the groups had expressed support for the Tennessee Sports Wagering Council’s effort to block sports betting company Kalshi from offering sports event contracts in the state, arguing the contracts amounted to illegal sports wagering under the Tennessee Sports Gaming Act. Kalshi sued the council on Jan. 9 after receiving a cease-and-desist letter threatening civil and criminal penalties. Trauger granted a temporary restraining order, preventing the council from taking regulatory action while Kalshi’s preliminary injunction motion is pending, with Kalshi maintaining that the federal Commodity Futures Trading Commission has exclusive authority over its contracts.