DANIEL JOSEPH WILLIAMS v. TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY AND HOMELAND SECURITY - Articles

All Content

DANIEL JOSEPH WILLIAMS v. TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY AND HOMELAND SECURITY

Posted by: Azya Thornton on Jul 14, 2026

Court: TN Court of Appeals

Attorneys 1: Herbert S. Moncier, Knoxville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Daniel Joseph Williams.

Attorneys 2: Jonathan Skrmetti, Attorney General and Reporter; J. Matthew Rice, Solicitor General; Jacobs M. Gilbert and Brian Enright, Assistant Attorneys General, for the appellee, Tennessee Department of Safety and Homeland Security.

Judge(s): FRIERSON

The petitioner filed a petition seeking judicial review of certain interlocutory decisions made by an administrative law judge during forfeiture proceedings conducted by the Tennessee Department of Safety and Homeland Security. The petitioner also raised constitutional issues that had not been raised during the agency proceedings. The trial court determined that it did not possess subject matter jurisdiction to review the interlocutory agency decisions or other constitutional issues raised for the first time in the petition for judicial review. The petitioner has appealed. Discerning no reversible error, we affirm.

Attachments: