ROBERT MICHAEL SWAFFORD v. CATHERINE LYDIA TRAIL SWAFFORD - Articles

All Content

ROBERT MICHAEL SWAFFORD v. CATHERINE LYDIA TRAIL SWAFFORD

Posted by: Azya Thornton on Jan 23, 2026

Court: TN Court of Appeals

Attorneys 1: Cecelia S. Petersen, Knoxville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Catherine Lydia Trail Swafford.

Attorneys 2: Howard L. Upchurch and Stacy H. Farmer, Pikeville, Tennessee, for the appellee, Robert Michael Swafford.

Judge(s): USMAN

Husband and Wife divorced. In dividing the marital estate, the trial court determined that an account inherited by Wife had been transmuted into marital property and that Wife had dissipated a substantial portion of the transmuted account. Considered as a whole, the trial court allocated the marital estate in a manner that Wife asserted was inequitable. She repeatedly requested findings by the trial court explicating its division of marital estate. The trial court declined to provide such findings. On appeal, Wife challenges the trial court’s classification of the aforementioned account and its conclusion that she dissipated the account. Wife also challenges the trial court’s overall division of marital property both as being inequitable and for the insufficiency of the trial court’s findings. We affirm the trial court’s ruling as to transmutation. We vacate the trial court’s ruling as to dissipation and the trial court’s division of property, and we remand for further proceedings.

Attachments: