BRYAN HIBDON v. DANIELLE GOYNES - Articles

All Content

BRYAN HIBDON v. DANIELLE GOYNES

Posted by: Azya Thornton on Dec 18, 2025

Court: TN Court of Appeals

Attorneys 1: E. Evan Cope and Katharine Driver, Murfreesboro, Tennessee, for the appellant, Danielle Goynes.

Attorneys 2: L. Jeffery Payne and Laurie Y. Young, Murfreesboro, Tennessee, for the appellee, Bryan Hibdon.

Judge(s): MCBRAYER

A father petitioned a Tennessee court to modify its previous parenting plan. The father lived in Tennessee, but the mother and the child lived in Arkansas. Claiming Tennessee was an inconvenient forum, the mother moved to transfer the case to Arkansas. The court denied the transfer request. Later, the court entered a default judgment against the mother as a sanction for her failure to appear for her deposition. After hearing proof, it adopted the father’s proposed parenting plan. On appeal, the mother contends that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to modify the parenting plan. She also challenges the court’s denial of her transfer request, its refusal to set aside the default judgment, and the adoption of a modified plan. We conclude that the court erred in modifying the parenting plan without conducting a best interest analysis. So we vacate the adoption of a modified plan and remand for further proceedings on this issue. In all other respects, we affirm.

Attachments: