HEATHER PIPER DIDOMENICO v. JAMES ANDREW DIDOMENICO - Articles

All Content

HEATHER PIPER DIDOMENICO v. JAMES ANDREW DIDOMENICO

Posted by: Azya Thornton on Nov 7, 2025

Court: TN Court of Appeals

Attorneys 1: Brandon Michael Booten, Gallatin, Tennessee, and John C. Taylor and Charles G. Ward, Murfreesboro, Tennessee, for the appellant, James Andrew DiDomenico.

Attorneys 2: Roger A. Maness, Clarksville, Tennessee, for the appellee, Heather Piper DiDomenico.

Judge(s): BENNETT

Husband appeals the trial court’s judgment in his divorce action on the sole issue of whether the trial judge should have recused himself because the judge’s comments and conduct at the trial establish that his impartiality might reasonably be questioned. Applying the objective standard, we find no basis for the trial judge’s recusal and affirm the decision of the trial court.

Attachments: