STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CONSTANCE MONIEKA EVERY - Articles

All Content

STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CONSTANCE MONIEKA EVERY

Posted by: Azya Thornton on Oct 7, 2025

Court: TN Court of Criminal Appeals

Attorneys 1: Andrew O. Beamer (on appeal and at trial) and David A. Stuart (at trial), Knoxville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Constance Monieka Every.

Attorneys 2: Jonathan Skrmetti, Attorney General and Reporter; Richard D. Douglas, Senior Assistant Attorney General; Charme P. Allen, District Attorney General; and Sean F. McDermott, Molly T. Martin, and Franklin Ammons, Assistant District Attorneys General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee.

Judge(s): CAMPBELL

The Defendant was convicted in the Knox County Criminal Court of disrupting a lawful meeting, a Class A misdemeanor, and received an eleven-month, twenty-nine-day sentence to be served on supervised probation. On appeal, the Defendant claims that the evidence is insufficient to support her conviction and that the statute prohibiting disruption of a lawful meeting is unconstitutionally vague as applied to her. Based on our review, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Attachments: