DONALD BARTSCH, JR. v. PREMIER ORTHOPAEDICS & SPORTS MEDICINE, PLC - Articles

All Content


Posted by: Azya Thornton on Aug 12, 2025

Court: TN Court of Appeals

Attorneys 1: Clinton L. Kelly and F. Dulin Kelly, Hendersonville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Donald Bartsch, Jr.

Attorneys 2: Nathaniel T. Gorman and James E. Looper, Jr., Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellee, Premier Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine, PLC.

Judge(s): MCGEE

This is a health care liability case that centers around the application of the discovery rule. The trial court granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss with prejudice after determining that the discovery rule did not toll the accrual of the statute of limitations to the time asserted by the plaintiff. The trial court based this determination on two independent bases. The first basis was predicated on certain information provided by the defendants, which was taken from the Tennessee Secretary of State’s website. The trial court took judicial notice of this information and determined that it indicated that a reasonable person would have been able to discover the identity of the defendant. The second basis, an express alternative finding, stated that even if the information was not considered, sufficient information existed in exhibits attached to the plaintiff’s complaint to support its determination. The plaintiff appeals. We affirm.

Attachments: