IESHA MITCHELL, guardian and next friend of A.M. et al. v. CITY OF BENTON HARBOR, MICHIGAN; MARCUS MUHAMMAD; MICHAEL O’MALLEY; DARWIN WATSON; LIESL CLARK; ERIC OSWALD; ERNEST SARKIPATO; BRANDON ONAN; ELHORN ENGINEERING COMPANY - Articles

All Content

IESHA MITCHELL, guardian and next friend of A.M. et al. v. CITY OF BENTON HARBOR, MICHIGAN; MARCUS MUHAMMAD; MICHAEL O’MALLEY; DARWIN WATSON; LIESL CLARK; ERIC OSWALD; ERNEST SARKIPATO; BRANDON ONAN; ELHORN ENGINEERING COMPANY

Posted by: Azya Thornton on Aug 12, 2025

Court: 6th Circuit Court (Published Opinions)

Attorneys 1: ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC: Thomas J. Rheaume, Jr., Alexandra C. Markel, Walter G. Pelton

Attorneys 2: ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC: BODMAN PLC, Detroit, Michigan, for City of Benton Harbor Appellees.

Attorneys 3: ON RESPONSE: Melanie Daly, Corey Stern, LEVY KONIGSBERG LLP, New York, New York, for Appellants.

Judge(s): MOORE, COLE, and LARSEN, Circuit Judges

Court Appealed: United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan at Grand Rapids

The court received a petition for rehearing en banc. The original panel has reviewed the petition for rehearing and concludes that the issues raised in the petition were fully considered upon the original submission and decision. The petition was then circulated to the full court.* Less than a majority of the judges voted in favor of rehearing en banc. Therefore, the petition is denied.

Attachments: