CHRISTOPHER L. WIESMUELLER v. CORRINE NICHOLE OLIVER - Articles

All Content


Posted by: Azya Thornton on Mar 28, 2025

Court: TN Court of Appeals

Attorneys 1: Christopher Lee Wiesmueller, White House, Tennessee, pro se appellant.

Attorneys 2: Ellen Hendrickson, Charlotte, Tennessee, for the appellee, Corrine Nichole Oliver.

Judge(s): MCBRAYER

A mother and father filed competing petitions to modify their parenting plan. The Father also sought to modify his child support obligation. In furtherance of these goals, he asked the court to admit evidence of events occurring before the denial of his previous petition to modify the parenting plan. He also moved for appointment of a guardian ad litem and for an order requiring his past Tennessee Rule of Civil Procedure 35 examinations to be destroyed. The court denied each of Father’s pretrial requests. It found that no material change in circumstance had occurred and that modification of the parenting plan was not in the children’s best interests. Because the trial court erred in its application of the child support guidelines, we vacate part of the child support award and remand for recalculation of Father’s obligation. Otherwise, we affirm.