FRANK L. SLAUGHTER, JR. v. BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE - Articles

All Content

FRANK L. SLAUGHTER, JR. v. BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE

Posted by: Azya Thornton on Feb 6, 2025

Court: TN Supreme Court

Attorneys 1: Robert Deno Cole, Knoxville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Frank L. Slaughter, Jr.

Attorneys 2: James W. Milam, Brentwood, Tennessee, for the appellee, Board of Professional Responsibility.

Judge(s): BIVINS

A hearing panel of the Board of Professional Responsibility found that a Sullivan County attorney violated Rules 1.6, 4.4, and 8.4 of the Tennessee Rules of Professional Conduct after the attorney disclosed confidential information about a client’s case to third parties in a separate case. The hearing panel imposed a public censure as punishment. The attorney appealed, and the chancery court affirmed the hearing panel’s decision. The attorney now appeals to this Court, arguing that Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 9 violates his due process rights and that his actions did not amount to violations of Rules 1.6 and 4.4. After careful review, we affirm the judgment of the chancery court with regard to Rule 1.6. However, we reverse the chancery court’s judgment upholding the hearing panel’s finding that the attorney violated Rule 4.4.

Attachments: