STATE OF TENNESSEE v. KYLE J. FREY - Articles

All Content


Posted by: Azya Thornton on Jan 21, 2025

Court: TN Court of Criminal Appeals

Attorneys 1: Kyle J. Frey, Columbia, Tennessee, Pro Se.

Attorneys 2: Jonathan Skrmetti, Attorney General and Reporter; William C. Lundy, Assistant Attorney General; Stacey Edmonson, District Attorney General; Dale L. Evans, Assistant District Attorney General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee.

Judge(s): MONTGOMERY

The pro se Defendant, Kyle J. Frey, was convicted by a Williamson County jury of driving under the influence of an intoxicant (DUI); DUI per se; resisting arrest; and speeding. See T.C.A. §§ 55-10-401 (DUI) (2024); 39-16-602(a) (2018) (resisting arrest); 55-8-152 (Supp. 2021) (subsequently amended) (speeding). The trial court merged the DUI convictions. The Defendant received an effective sentence of eleven months and twenty-nine days, suspended to supervised probation after service of sixty days’ incarceration. On appeal, the Defendant alleges that the trial court did not have subject matter jurisdiction. We conclude that the Defendant’s brief fails to comply with Tennessee Rule of Appellate Procedure 27 and Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals Rule 10(b) and that the appellate record is incomplete. See T.R.A.P. 24(b). Accordingly, the Defendant’s issues are waived, and his appeal is dismissed.

Attachments: