ROBERT W. HALLIMAN v. AUSTIN PEAY STATE UNIVERSITY - Articles

All Content

ROBERT W. HALLIMAN v. AUSTIN PEAY STATE UNIVERSITY

Posted by: Azya Thornton on Dec 13, 2024

Court: TN Court of Appeals

Attorneys 1: Joe Weyant, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Robert W. Halliman.

Attorneys 2: Jonathan Skrmetti, Attorney General and Reporter; J. Matthew Rice, Solicitor General; and Jeffrey B. Cadle, Assistant Attorney General, for the appellee, Austin Peay State University.

Judge(s): CLEMENT

This is an action for violation of the Tennessee Human Rights Act, Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 4- 21-101 to -1004 (“THRA”). The plaintiff, an associate professor at a state university, applied for promotion to the rank of full professor. While his application was under review, the plaintiff filed an age discrimination charge against the university with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”). A short time later, the university denied the plaintiff’s promotion based on his alleged lack of high-quality scholarship. The trial court dismissed the action at the summary judgment stage, reasoning that the plaintiff had not produced evidence to rebut the university’s stated reason for denying his promotion. This appeal followed. The plaintiff contends that the trial court erred because there was evidence that the university’s administration knowingly violated university policy by reevaluating the merits of the plaintiff’s peer-reviewed scholarship. We affirm the trial court’s judgment in all respects.

Attachments: