FRED AUSTON WORTMAN, III v. ERIC SHIRKEY - Articles

All Content

FRED AUSTON WORTMAN, III v. ERIC SHIRKEY

Posted by: Azya Thornton on Sep 17, 2024

Court: TN Court of Appeals

Attorneys 1: Tim Arrants and James Marple, Jefferson City, Tennessee, for the Appellant, Fred Auston Wortman, III.

Attorneys 2: Reid A. Spaulding, Knoxville, Tennessee, for the appellee, Eric Shirkey.

This appeal concerns whether witness testimony in the course of a parole hearing is absolutely privileged. Fred Auston Wortman, III (“Plaintiff”), a prisoner, filed a defamation lawsuit against Eric Shirkey (“Defendant”), a detective who testified at Plaintiff’s parole hearing, in the Circuit Court for Morgan County (“the Trial Court”).1 Plaintiff alleged that Defendant’s statements about him at the parole hearing, such as calling Plaintiff a “narcissist,” damaged his reputation. Defendant filed a motion to dismiss, which the Trial Court granted. The Trial Court concluded that Defendant’s statements were absolutely privileged. Plaintiff appeals, arguing that his parole hearing was administrative rather than judicial in nature, so Defendant’s statements were not protected by absolute privilege. We hold that the parole board, in considering whether to grant Plaintiff parole, was exercising a judicial function such that absolute privilege extended to testimony at the parole hearing. We hold further that Defendant’s statements were relevant and pertinent to the issues involved. Therefore, Defendant’s statements at Plaintiff’s parole hearing were absolutely privileged. We affirm.

Attachments: