Suspensions


19 Posts found
Previous • Page 2 of 2
Posted on: Sep 3, 2014
Suspensions: CLE Suspensions

The following attorneys were suspended by the Supreme Court on Aug. 25, 2014, for failing to comply with Rule 21 of the Rules of the Tennessee Supreme Court, which requires mandatory continuing legal education, for the 2013 compliance year. Attorneys who have since complied with CLE requirements, and for whom notice has been received from the court, are noted as reinstated.

Posted on: Aug 21, 2013
Suspensions: CLE Suspensions

The following attorneys were suspended by the Supreme Court on Aug. 21, 2013, for failing to comply with Rule 21 of the Rules of the Tennessee Supreme Court, which requires mandatory continuing legal education, in the 2012 compliance year. Attorneys who have since complied with CLE requirements, and for whom notice has been received from the court, are noted as reinstated.

Posted on: Sep 5, 2012
Suspensions: CLE Suspensions

The following attorneys were suspended by the Supreme Court on Aug. 31, 2012, for failing to comply with Rule 21 of the Rules of the Tennessee Supreme Court, which requires mandatory continuing legal education, for the 2011 compliance year. Attorneys who have since complied with CLE requirements, and for whom notice has been received from the court, are noted as reinstated.

Posted on: Aug 31, 2011
Suspensions: CLE Suspensions

The following attorneys were suspended by the Supreme Court on Aug. 31, 2011, for failing to comply with Rule 21 of the Rules of the Tennessee Supreme Court, which requires mandatory continuing legal education, during the 2010 compliance year. Attorneys who have since complied with CLE requirements, and for whom notice has been received from the court, are noted as reinstated.

Posted on: Sep 7, 2010
Suspensions: CLE Suspensions

The following attorneys were suspended by the Supreme Court on Sept. 7, 2010, for failing to comply with Rule 21 of the Rules of the Tennessee Supreme Court, which requires mandatory continuing legal education, in the 2009 compliance year. Attorneys who have since complied with CLE requirements, and for whom notice has been received from the court, are noted as reinstated.

Posted on: Aug 31, 2009
Suspensions: CLE Suspensions

The following attorneys were suspended by the Supreme Court on Aug. 31 and Sept. 4, 2009, for failing to comply with Rule 21 of the Rules of the Tennessee Supreme Court, which requires mandatory continuing legal education, during the 2008 compliance year. Attorneys who have since complied with CLE requirements, and for whom notice has been received from the court, are noted as reinstated.

Posted on: Aug 15, 2008
Suspensions: CLE Suspensions

The following attorneys were suspended by the Supreme Court on Aug. 15, 27 and 29, 2008, for failing to comply with Rule 21 of the Rules of the Tennessee Supreme Court, which requires mandatory continuing legal education, during the 2007 compliance year. Attorneys who have since complied with CLE requirements, and for whom notice has been received from the court, are noted as reinstated.

Posted on: Sep 21, 2007
Suspensions: CLE Suspensions

The attorneys listed below were suspended by the Supreme Court on Sept. 21, 2007, for failure to comply with Rule 21 of the Rules of the Tennessee Supreme Court, which requires mandatory continuing legal education, during the 2006 compliance year. Attorneys who have since complied with CLE requirements, and for whom notice has been received from the court, are noted as reinstated.

Posted on: Sep 1, 2006
Suspensions: CLE Suspensions

The attorneys listed below were suspended by the Supreme Court on Sept. 1, 2006, for failure to comply with Rule 21 of the Rules of the Tennessee Supreme Court, which requires mandatory continuing legal education, during the 2005 compliance year. Attorneys who have since complied with CLE requirements, and for whom notice has been received from the court, are noted as reinstated.


Previous • Page 2 of 2