The Tennessee Supreme Court will hear arguments Nov. 6 in Jackson in the case of State of Tennessee v. Pervis Tyrone Payne. The court will look at whether the trial court had jurisdiction to reconsider the consecutive alignment of sentences after a determination of intellectual disability. Payne was convicted of two counts of first-degree murder and one count of assault with intent to commit murder. He was sentenced to death for the murder charges and to 30 years in the assault case, to be run consecutively. In 2021, the General Assembly provided a process by which death row inmates may challenge the death penalty due to an intellectual disability. Payne filed under the new law and after evaluation was determined to meet the definition of intellectual disability. Payne’s attorneys and the state agreed that he should receive two life sentences but disagreed whether the sentences should be served consecutively or concurrently. The trial court found that the sentences should run concurrently. The appeals court affirmed. The state is appealing that decision. Arguments will begin at 1 p.m. CST and be livestreamed to the TNCourts YouTube page.

The Tennessee Supreme Court has ordered a change in the classification of personal contact information that attorneys provide to the Board of Professional Responsibility. Personal contact information now will be considered confidential and not public record. The change was requested by the board in June. After receiving comments from the Tennessee Bar Association, the Knoxville Bar Association and others that lawyers should be asked to provide alternative contact information that can be made public, the court allowed TBA and the board to develop new language, which it now has adopted. The alternative contact information must be submitted by Jan. 1, 2025. Read more in a press release from the Administrative Office of the Courts.

The Tennessee Supreme Court has issued an order allowing out-of-state lawyers to temporarily offer their services, free of charge, to residents affected by severe flooding in East Tennessee. The order follows a joint request from the Tennessee Alliance for Legal Services (TALS) and Legal Aid of East Tennessee (LAET) asking the court to activate Rule 47 — which was first enacted in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina — to help those impacted by natural disasters. Lawyers who register may provide legal services in affected areas without seeking pro hac vice admission or paying an admission fee. Read more from the Administrative Office of the Courts. The state of North Carolina issued a similar order after Hurricane Helene, allowing Tennessee lawyers to provide pro bono services to storm survivors there.

The Tennessee Supreme Court last week heard arguments in two challenges to redrawn legislative districts for the state Senate and House, the Nashville Banner reports. A three-judge panel ruled in 2023 that the Senate map was unconstitutional because the districts in Davidson County were not numbered consecutively. The state is challenging that decision, questioning the plaintiff’s standing to sue. The same panel found the House map to be constitutional even though it split Gibson County, saying the legislature acted in good faith. Attorney Scott Tift argued the court should overturn that decision because the state constitution only allows splitting to comply with federal redistricting laws.

The Tennessee Supreme Court today held that a party could not recover attorney’s fees for fighting a SLAPP lawsuit when the person bringing the suit dropped the case. In the matter before the court, Robert E. Lee Flade sued several defendants based for what he considered to be disparaging remarks on social media. In response, two defendants filed petitions under the Tennessee Public Participation Act (TPPA), arguing that that the suit was brought primarily to chill speech rather than to prevail on the merits. Before the petitions were heard by the trial court, Flade voluntarily dismissed his suit. The defendants sought payment of their attorney’s fees, as allowed under TPPA, but the court found that the dismissal precluded consideration of the fee request. Read more in a release from the court.

The Tennessee Supreme Court issued an order seeking comments on proposed changes to Rules 9 and 33, which would increase the annual registration fee from $170 to $270 and allocate the funds as follows: $225 to the Board of Professional Responsibility (up from $140), $15 to the Tennessee Lawyers’ Fund for Client Protection (up from $10), and $30 to the Tennessee Lawyer Assistance Program (up from $20). The court says the proposal is based on its own comprehensive review of the sufficiency of the annual registration fee and the allocation of funds it generates. Comments should be submitted by Nov. 8 and mailed to Clerk James Hivner, RE: Proposed Amendments to Tenn. Sup. Ct. R. 9 & 33, 100 Supreme Court Building, 401 7th Ave. N., Nashville, TN 37219-1407 or by email to appellatecourtclerk@tncourts.gov. Comments should reference docket number ADM2024-01525.

The Tennessee Supreme Court has issued a corrected version of an order released on Sept. 23 reassigning justices to the state’s various judicial districts. Jeffrey S. Bivins has replaced recently retired Roger A. Page as the justice for Circuit No. 2, which consists of Judicial Districts 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 31. Mary L. Wagner has replaced Bivins as the justice for Circuit No. 4, which consists of Districts 17, 21, 22, 23, 24, 26 and 32. The amended order clarifies that Circuit No. 4 includes the 32nd Judicial District.

The Tennessee Supreme Court has activated a limited disaster plan for trial courts in four judicial districts impacted by severe flooding from Hurricane Helene. The order extends deadlines for filings, statutes of limitation and certain court orders by 45 days, from Sept. 26 to Nov. 12. Orders of protection and temporary injunctions that would otherwise expire between those dates are now extended until Nov. 12. This action follows emergency declarations by Gov. Bill Lee and President Joe Biden that an emergency exists in the state of Tennessee, including parts of the First, Second, Third and Fourth Judicial Districts, according to a press release from the Administrative Office of the Courts.

The Tennessee Supreme Court today issued an order amending Rule 13 to among other things, make changes to the Administrative Office of the Court’s (AOC) Claims and Payment System (ACAP). To give the AOC time to implement the changes, the court set the effective date for Sec. 6(a)(1) as Dec. 1. All other changes — including those related to the financial obligations of parents, legal custodians and guardians in cases when a guardian ad litem is appointed and the crimes that affect the maximum compensation allowed for appointed criminal cases — will take effect immediately. The AOC had proposed various amendments to the rule on March 7. The court accepted comments on the proposal through May 6.

The Tennessee Supreme Court has adopted an order amending Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 31(15)(b) following a petition from the Alternative Dispute Resolution Commission (ADRC) asking the court for discretion when considering a Rule 31 application training requirement. The court amended the rule to add the following language: “The ADRC may grant a training waiver upon appropriate application for those whose credentials have lapsed for failure to comply with CME requirements pursuant to Rule 31(15)(a) for failure to timely renew under Rule 31(15)(b), or for any other reason deemed sufficient by the Commission.” The court reported that during the comment period on the proposed change it received responses from the ADRC, the Knoxville Bar Association, the Tennessee Bar Association and private individuals.