Knox County lawyer Jerry Ronald Givens received a public censure from the Tennessee Supreme Court on April 14. The court found that Givens violated Rules of Professional Conduct 1.3, 3.4 and Rule 8.4(d) while representing a client in a general sessions civil suit. Among his actions, Givens failed to attend the initial trial setting, at which a judgment was entered against his client; untimely appealed the judgment to circuit court after the 10-day appeal deadline; untimely filed an appellate brief; failed to comply with an extension of time to file the brief; and failed to file a motion for extension of time to file the brief after being directed to do so by the court.

Sullivan County lawyer Steven Carl Frazier received a public censure from the Tennessee Supreme Court on April 17. The court found that Frazier violated Rules of Professional Conduct 1.4(a), 1.5(a) & (b) and 1.15(a) & (b). It conditioned the censure on refunding his client $2,500 within 30 days. Frazier was retained by the client for representation in a property boundary dispute. The court found that Frazier did not deposit the retainer fee into his trust account and wrongfully commingled the client funds with his own. The court also found that he did not track his time, issue an invoice for legal services, or communicate the rate of his fee or expenses the client would pay. He also did not obtain a signed explanation of the parties’ intent and amount of non-refundable funds. He later stopped responding to the client’s requests for updates and took no further action on the case. Finally, the court found that while Frazier offered to refund one-half of the client’s fees three years after the client filed a disciplinary complaint, the fees were never refunded.

Wilson County lawyer Mitchell Jeffery Ferguson received a public censure from the Tennessee Supreme Court on April 17. Ferguson was appointed to represent a client who was charged with several felonies, including first degree murder. During the representation, Ferguson failed to appear for multiple court hearings and failed to communicate with the court and his client about hearing dates and absences. The Supreme Court also found that he failed to provide communication or copies of legal documents to the client and failed to meet with the client for trial preparation. His inaction resulted in multiple continuances, removal from the case and postponement of the client’s murder trial, thereby prejudicing the administration of justice. His actions violated Rules of Professional Conduct 1.3, 1.4, 3.2 and 8.4(d).

Shelby County lawyer Robert Andrew Pope received a public censure from the Tennessee Supreme Court on April 16. The court found that Pope violated Rule of Professional Conduct 8.1(b) when he failed to disclose a material fact regarding his termination from the Tennessee Department of Corrections while his bar admission application was pending.

The law license of Hardeman County lawyer William Boyette Denton was transferred to disability inactive status on April 11. Denton cannot practice law while on inactive status but may return to the practice of law after showing that his disability has been removed and being reinstated.

Sevier County lawyer Tommy Joe Norton received a public censure from the Tennessee Supreme Court on April 15. The court found that Norton violated Rules of Professional Conduct 1.3, 1.4, 3.2, 3.4 and 8.4(d) while representing four clients. During this time, Norton closed his office and changed his phone number but failed to inform clients of the changes, leaving them no way to contact him. The court also found that Norton failed to maintain communication with and diligently represent the clients. Additionally, in one case, Norton failed to appear in court and incorrectly advised his client not to appear. In a second case he asked for multiple continuances, which delayed the proceedings. And in another case, he essentially abandoned his client and failed to show up in court.

The Tennessee Supreme Court imposed a public censure on Bedford County lawyer Richard Lamar Dugger on April 9. The court found that Dugger violated Rules of Professional Conduct 1.1, 1.3, 3.2 and 3.4 in representing one client in a bankruptcy case and a second client in a landlord tenant case. In the first complaint, the court found that Dugger failed to include his client’s home in a bankruptcy matter, which resulted in his client’s home being foreclosed. In the second matter, Dugger failed to appear in court, failed to take action following the entry of an adverse judgment against his client and delayed the outcome of the case.

The Tennessee Board of Professional Responsibility (BPR) has issued two new ethics opinions. The first, 2025-F-171, addresses the ethical propriety of a non-disparagement clause in a products liability case settlement agreement that makes the lawyers in Firm A parties to the settlement proposed by Firm B. The second, 2025-F-172, addresses limited scope legal services provided by a private attorney. That opinion states that attorneys may engage in limited scope representation so long as it is reasonable under the circumstances and the client gives informed consent, preferably in writing. Attorneys also must follow the Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure, specifically Rule 11.0l(b) and (c) regarding disclosure of such limited scope representation. See all past opinions from the board. Update: On April 21, 2025, the Board of Professional Responsibility voted to withdraw formal ethics opinion 2025-F-172.

The Tennessee Supreme Court on March 26 directed the Board of Board of Professional Responsibility to respond to a filing by California lawyer Dale Gerard Nowicki that discipline imposed against him by the California Supreme Court should not be imposed in Tennessee. The court directed Nowicki to explain why reciprocal discipline should not imposed. He responded on March 10, arguing that identical discipline should not be imposed in Tennessee. The court directed the BPR to file its response by April 23.

Mississippi lawyer Carlos Eugene Moore was suspended from the practice of law in Tennessee on March 27 after being suspended by the Supreme Court of Mississippi on Dec. 31, 2024. The reciprocal discipline was imposed after the Tennessee Supreme Court reviewed Moore’s response to its Feb. 25 order directing him to demonstrate why the discipline imposed in Mississippi should not also be applied in Tennessee.